On 3 March 2012 23:25, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3 March 2012 22:44, John Du Hart
<compwhizii(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I really don't understand why we'd rather
suffer than use a superior
> proprietary product.
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Values
Duplicability down to the infrastructure is considered extremely
important, or the free content isn't free. "Open core" fails this
test.
(I will note that the Foundation has used nonfree software in
infrastructure, e.g. Java before it was freed, Solaris 10 - but only
on the way to something free.)
- d.