On 27 June 2012 14:38, Petr Kadlec <petr.kadlec(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 27 June 2012 13:33, Achim Flammenkamp
<achim(a)uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> 2) I wonder why the SVG-graphic devolpers use such an "improper"(?)
rendering-
> philosophy. All these articfacts on the Iran-flag would have been avoided, if
> the rendering is divided up logical into two steps: Firstly render the SVG-code
> to the size given in this SVG-code (or an integer multiple for large final sizes) to
a pixel (discret) map.
I can imagine how this can be a problem. Thin lines than in your
original render have 1 pixel width, will be removed or suffer a strong
antialias wen reduced down.
Re-rendering a image on a smaller resolution will result on a pixel
perfect image (except thick eyebrows), where 1 pixel width is still 1
pixel.
(no related)
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php?#liquid-rescale
Technical remark: The width/height specified in the SVG file is a
generic “length” value [1], which can be in other units than pixels
[2] and also can take non-integral values. [3]
...and the situation is even more complex than that. So more things
that thing can go wrong.
--
--
ℱin del ℳensaje.