On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Brion Vibber brion@pobox.com wrote:
To a certain degree, I'd actually consider it desirable to have a permanent 'slush' to the extent that destabilizing work should *always* be talked out a bit and tested before it lands on trunk/head/master.
+100
If we're not ready to go fully git the instant we branch 1.19, we may wish to consider applying more formal review to things proposed to go into trunk on SVN. This may be simpler than attempting to synchronize SVN and git via post-SVN-pre-git reviews...
I'm inclined to agree here too.
-Chad