On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Brion Vibber <brion(a)pobox.com> wrote:
To a certain degree, I'd actually consider it
desirable to have a permanent
'slush' to the extent that destabilizing work should *always* be talked out
a bit and tested before it lands on trunk/head/master.
+100
If we're not ready to go fully git the instant we
branch 1.19, we may wish
to consider applying more formal review to things proposed to go into trunk
on SVN. This may be simpler than attempting to synchronize SVN and git via
post-SVN-pre-git reviews...
I'm inclined to agree here too.
-Chad