Hi Mike,
I think you may be hallucinating. We are just now hiring our second code-reviewer, who is also thinking about ways to make the code review process more transparent.
Danese
On 8/12/10 4:49 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Surely a few paid people can be assigned to make sure everything is reviewed, in place of some of their current coding duties.
Don't we already have staff for this? Hasn't "and finally get code review and deployment up to pace" been part of several hiring announcements over the past year or more? I appreciate that getting people to the place where they can do good code review takes time, but if that's what the problem is, then emails like this should immediately be met with exactly that explanation.
Or perhaps I hallucinated that the Foundation hired staff for this sort of thing.
- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkxkiIoACgkQst0AR/DaKHvETACgvRrBgjXtlBC2iFcINm1QQecP M6MAnRZEk2iq7PaMHnYV3KyWmF/4u6CS =0EVt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l