Hi Mike,
I think you may be hallucinating. We are just now hiring our second
code-reviewer, who is also thinking about ways to make the code review
process more transparent.
Danese
On 8/12/10 4:49 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Surely a few paid people can be assigned to make
sure everything is
reviewed, in place of some of their current coding duties.
Don't we already have staff for this? Hasn't "and finally get
code
review and deployment up to pace" been part of several hiring
announcements over the past year or more? I appreciate that getting
people to the place where they can do good code review takes time, but
if that's what the problem is, then emails like this should immediately
be met with exactly that explanation.
Or perhaps I hallucinated that the Foundation hired staff for this sort
of thing.
- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkxkiIoACgkQst0AR/DaKHvETACgvRrBgjXtlBC2iFcINm1QQecP
M6MAnRZEk2iq7PaMHnYV3KyWmF/4u6CS
=0EVt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l