On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:24:19PM +0100, Rob Church wrote:
On 21/08/06, Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com wrote:
I'd ask if anyone has any statistics on how often those tags are affixed and removed, but...
Wikipedians prefer to highlight and tag problems than to take 30 seconds to fix them, it seems. I can understand that larger cases crop up, and warrant attention from more than one person, but stupid little unsourced stubs don't need to be tagged - either find a source on the web, or find reference that a source might exist within five minutes, or "prod" it, or whatever we do now.
Well, that could be a failure in [[Be Bold]], or it could just be laziness. I wonder if there's any way to decide which...
Cheers, -- jra