On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:24:19PM +0100, Rob Church wrote:
On 21/08/06, Jay R. Ashworth <jra(a)baylink.com>
wrote:
I'd ask if anyone has any statistics on how
often those tags are
affixed and removed, but...
Wikipedians prefer to highlight and tag problems than to take 30
seconds to fix them, it seems. I can understand that larger cases crop
up, and warrant attention from more than one person, but stupid little
unsourced stubs don't need to be tagged - either find a source on the
web, or find reference that a source might exist within five minutes,
or "prod" it, or whatever we do now.
Well, that could be a failure in [[Be Bold]], or it could just be
laziness. I wonder if there's any way to decide which...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra(a)baylink.com
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
The Internet: We paved paradise, and put up a snarking lot.