On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:23:20 +0200, Jens Frank jeluf@gmx.de wrote:
Emmanuel and I have tested it: It is vulnerable to this approach.
Then it's implemented wrong. The idea Emmanuel described (keeping track of which templates have already been included so as to keep from including them again) should work. I can't tell from looking at the patch what the problem might be, but there must be some silly mistake we're not seeing. Is the "temporary table" a bit too temporary, maybe?
I just downloaded the phase3 code (I'd been using the 1.2.6 stable release) and am poking through it now... not that I'm probably going to be able to make heads or tails of it all for quite some time still (not really my style of coding, and I still have such a poor grasp of the "big picture" here with how most of the modules interface with each other).
-Bill Clark