On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:23:20 +0200, Jens Frank <jeluf(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Emmanuel and I have tested it: It is vulnerable to
this approach.
Then it's implemented wrong. The idea Emmanuel described (keeping
track of which templates have already been included so as to keep from
including them again) should work. I can't tell from looking at the
patch what the problem might be, but there must be some silly mistake
we're not seeing. Is the "temporary table" a bit too temporary,
maybe?
I just downloaded the phase3 code (I'd been using the 1.2.6 stable
release) and am poking through it now... not that I'm probably going
to be able to make heads or tails of it all for quite some time still
(not really my style of coding, and I still have such a poor grasp of
the "big picture" here with how most of the modules interface with
each other).
-Bill Clark