Unfortunately the communities use different languages. To improve the communication it's natural to split wikisource in different projects.
The same is valid also to implement solutions because it is easier to do it in smaller communities than to find an agreement satisfying the whole community.
Anyway an integration is welcome and can be a good solution but if Wikisource can offer the solution to build smaller linguistical subprojects inside a bigger one in order to keep an uniformity but also to satisfy the need of diversity.
Kind regards
On 28.11.2015 14:26, Alex Brollo wrote:
Thanks for interest. I work mainly into it.source, but I often try to work a little bit into other projects too for a number of reasons. I find unknown templates, tools, policies, all from them very interesting; and I do too some effort to import them into it.source, but it's difficult, since diversity grows daily and some good ideas are very difficult to implement into different contexts.
I'm only a wikisource active user, not more than this, I've not sufficient technical or organizing skills to build a project to revert what I see as a big mistake, and I'm far from sure that my opinion is right; but I feel the need to share this personal opinion.
About mul.source: my suggestion would be, to activate into it best tools and gadgets, best templates, best policies and best docs; to remove as soon as possible any trouble for its users; and to encourage users to upload there any multi-language book.
Alex