2015-08-10 14:47 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas at gmail.com>:
2015-08-10 15:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Brollo <alex.brollo
at gmail.com>:
First point is:
is it a safe practice to validate a page without reviewing its raw code?
Probably yes.
Obviously, it's safer to check the raw code but it's unrealistic to expect
the raw code to be review for all page. Anyway, the pages doesn't contain a
Probaby yes?? you're kidding?!... Of course, that is not safe! during the
validation (Proofread -> Validated level) it is particularly important to review the
wikitext (the raw code). "Work of literature" that we submit proofreading is not
just content, is also a FORM, and how to ensure that the form is correct without checking
typography, layout, used templates...
"it's unrealistic to expect the raw code to be review for all page"??
kidding again?! for all (~95k on pl. ws) the "green" pages - source code
(wikitext) has been revised, and not once, but three times!, at each change of the
status.
A big green button (!) "validate" at the end of the PREVIEW(!) content in Page
namespace WITHOUT displaying and reviewing wikitext content (raw code) it's a bad
proposal, declining the quality of proofreading process results. I propose simultaneous
addition a special level for such sites: "pseudovalidate" - best in pink - will
be able to easily pick out a "revised" page in such a way... and to check it
again - it will facilitate the work of administrators.
Z.