Well, your attitude isn't any better or do you think we can't read between the rows. Good to know that our issues are not for the ''general'' wikisource list. So we've learned at least that only general stuff belongs to this list and our issues are not general. Would you please tell us your definition of 'general'. Is it only everything that you consider acceptable, everybody else is not welcome? Sorry, but shitty attitude.
Cecil
2009/10/29 teak teak.wiki@gmail.com
And I don't think the attitude of the de.ws spokespeople is very helpful for their cause either. That's all my message was meant to convey... but goodluck garnering helpful answers. I, for one, would like to see this issue solved, so that this collective attitude of "de.ws community consensus" can finally get off the lawn of the general wikisource mailing list.
teak
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Klaus Graf klausgraf@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/10/29 teak teak.wiki@gmail.com:
way to label those who do not agree with your ideas...
There is a need for a law on comparisons to "Orwellian" these days, a la Godwin's.
teak
I do not think that this answer is very helpful. You can substitute "Orwellian" with "control freak" or so.
Joergens has written for the consensus of the German Wikisource
community.
Klaus Graf
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l