way to label those who do not agree with your ideas...
There is a need for a law on comparisons to "Orwellian" these days, a la Godwin's.
teak
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Michael Jörgens joergens.mic@googlemail.com wrote:
Because nothing happened the last few days. I will draw a conclusion form our point of view We, from the german language wikisource want the following faults in the proofread extension patched.
- IP-editing allowed, up to level 4: (ready). The reasons for that have been
shown again from different views during the last postings. The obstuctions by the current iplementaion have been proven.
- The possibility for setting every level as needed. as above
There is no problem to make this configurable by two variables. A good software programmer can implement this easily withour any faults and flaws. The two configuration variables should be on the level of common.js. If common.js is protected as it shold be there is no missuse possible. By this way the community of a wiki can decide wether they want to live in an Orwell like wiki or in a wiki which is conform to the basic thinking of the wiki-idea. On the other hand The Orwellianer should prove that the integrity of the work has been ruined by vandaling IP's The Orwellianer should prove that the integrity of the work has been ruined by members setting the wrong state. In a good community we can trust in the work of the members. If they can prove that, we could start a new discussion based on the reality. Greetings jöergens.mi
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l