way to label those who do not agree with your ideas...
There is a need for a law on comparisons to "Orwellian" these days, a
la Godwin's.
teak
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Michael Jörgens
<joergens.mic(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Because nothing happened the last few days. I will
draw a conclusion form
our point of view
We, from the german language wikisource want the following faults in the
proofread extension patched.
* IP-editing allowed, up to level 4: (ready). The reasons for that have been
shown again from different views during the last postings. The obstuctions
by the current iplementaion have been proven.
* The possibility for setting every level as needed. as above
There is no problem to make this configurable by two variables. A good
software programmer can implement
this easily withour any faults and flaws. The two configuration variables
should be on the level of common.js.
If common.js is protected as it shold be there is no missuse possible.
By this way the community of a wiki can decide wether they want to live in
an Orwell like wiki or in
a wiki which is conform to the basic thinking of the wiki-idea.
On the other hand
The Orwellianer should prove that the integrity of the work has been ruined
by vandaling IP's
The Orwellianer should prove that the integrity of the work has been ruined
by members setting the wrong state.
In a good community we can trust in the work of the members.
If they can prove that, we could start a new discussion based on the
reality.
Greetings
jöergens.mi
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l