The reporter refers it as Wikipedia / Wikimedia on several times on the article, in case you haven't noticed it. http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HKL/2011/03/22/ArticleHtmls...
I respect your opinion but for most part of world, Wiki means Wikipedia and not necessarily Wikileaks :)
Please note that the article was written by journo ( err... journalist) from the media publication and not me.
Regards Tinu Cherian
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Shlomi Fish shlomif@shlomifish.org wrote:
Hi CherianTinu,
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2011 13:34:18 CherianTinu Abraham wrote:
FYI
*The Hindustan Times ( Kolkata edition) : "Wiki wants Women"*
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HKL/2011/03/22/ArticleHtml
s/Wiki-wants-women-22032011101054.shtml?Mode=1
"Wiki wants Women".
*The international media is abuzz with the gender gap in Wikipedia contributors around the world. Also, a survey by Wikimedia Foundation
shows
that English Wiki has only 13% women editors. To level this skewed ratio,
"English Wiki".
I would have taken this article more seriously, if it hadn't called "Wikipedia" simply "Wiki":
Note that "wikip" is a useful shorthand for "Wikipedia" on IRC/IM/etc. but not simply "Wiki". This kind of mental sloppiness always makes me think that the person who say that is an idiot.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish--
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Understand what Open Source is - http://shlom.in/oss-fs
I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay (Attributed)
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .