The reporter refers it as Wikipedia / Wikimedia on several times on the
article, in case you haven't noticed it.
I respect your opinion but for most part of world, Wiki means Wikipedia and
not necessarily Wikileaks :)
Please note that the article was written by journo ( err... journalist) from
the media publication and not me.
Regards
Tinu Cherian
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Shlomi Fish <shlomif(a)shlomifish.org> wrote:
Hi CherianTinu,
On Tuesday 22 Mar 2011 13:34:18 CherianTinu Abraham wrote:
FYI
*The Hindustan Times ( Kolkata edition) : "Wiki wants Women"*
http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/PUBLICATIONS/HT/HKL/2011/03/22/ArticleHtml
s/Wiki-wants-women-22032011101054.shtml?Mode=1
"Wiki wants Women".
*The international media is abuzz with the gender gap in Wikipedia
contributors around the world. Also, a survey by Wikimedia Foundation
shows
that English Wiki has only 13% women editors. To
level this skewed ratio,
"English Wiki".
I would have taken this article more seriously, if it hadn't called
"Wikipedia" simply "Wiki":
*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki
*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiWikiWeb
*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia
Note that "wikip" is a useful shorthand for "Wikipedia" on
IRC/IM/etc. but
not
simply "Wiki". This kind of mental sloppiness always makes me think that
the
person who say that is an idiot.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish
http://www.shlomifish.org/
Understand what Open Source is -
http://shlom.in/oss-fs
I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++
in
mind. -- Alan Kay (Attributed)
Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post -
http://shlom.in/reply .