How about you all contribute to the discussion proper, rather than suggesting things which, if made on-wiki, would result in an immediate block for inappropriate behaviour?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Joseph Reagle joseph.2008@reagle.orgwrote:
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
There are some excruciatingly naive arguments being made on the essay's talk page, e.g.:
Is this the sort of thing that would benefit from public pillory? For example, a posting on Geek Feminism blog or elsewhere? On one hand, I think such attitudes merit public critique, on the other, I wouldn't want such efforts to backfire and make Wikipedia even less appealing to possible contributors, particularly if this is just a rat hole.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap