How about you all contribute to the discussion proper, rather than suggesting things which, if made on-wiki, would result in an immediate block for inappropriate behaviour?

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2008@reagle.org> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> There are some excruciatingly naive arguments being made on the essay's
> talk page, e.g.:

Is this the sort of thing that would benefit from public pillory? For example, a posting on Geek Feminism blog or elsewhere? On one hand, I think such attitudes merit public critique, on the other, I wouldn't want such efforts to backfire and make Wikipedia even less appealing to possible contributors, particularly if this is just a rat hole.

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap