How about you all contribute to the discussion proper, rather than
suggesting things which, if made on-wiki, would result in an immediate block
for inappropriate behaviour?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Joseph Reagle <joseph.2008(a)reagle.org>wrote;wrote:
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
There are some excruciatingly naive arguments
being made on the essay's
talk page, e.g.:
Is this the sort of thing that would benefit from public pillory? For
example, a posting on Geek Feminism blog or elsewhere? On one hand, I think
such attitudes merit public critique, on the other, I wouldn't want such
efforts to backfire and make Wikipedia even less appealing to possible
contributors, particularly if this is just a rat hole.
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap