I agree with you too on that. apps are redundant, unless one has the resources to support. 'Nativity' is great and can unleash some potentials, which are hard to accomplish via browsers.

I personally find the mobile site for Wikipedia great enough and I use it for editing instead of the native app.

rexford | google.com/+Nkansahrexford | sent from smartphone On Aug 16, 2014 9:34 AM, "Nkansah Rexford" nkansahrexford@gmail.com wrote:

I agree with you too on that. apps are redundant, unless one has the resources to support. 'Nativity' is great and can unleash some potentials, which are hard to accomplish via browsers.

I personally find the mobile site for Wikipedia great enough and I use it for editing instead of the native app.

rexford | google.com/+Nkansahrexford | sent from smartphone On Aug 16, 2014 9:28 AM, "svetlana" svetlana@fastmail.com.au wrote:

On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, at 12:45, Nkansah Rexford wrote:

...

[...] The Wikipedia app is currently under good development and I think its

doing

...

great.

We don't need apps. We need mobile websites which work as good as an app does. Oh, the waste of effort.

I truly pledge you to work together to make a website which is so good that an 'app' is redundant.

svetlana

---

Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l