I agree with you too on that. apps are redundant, unless one has the
resources to support. 'Nativity' is great and can unleash some potentials,
which are hard to accomplish via browsers.
I personally find the mobile site for Wikipedia great enough and I use it
for editing instead of the native app.
rexford |
google.com/+Nkansahrexford | sent from smartphone
On Aug 16, 2014 9:34 AM, "Nkansah Rexford" <nkansahrexford(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I agree with you too on that. apps are redundant,
unless one has the
resources to support. 'Nativity' is great and can unleash some potentials,
which are hard to accomplish via browsers.
I personally find the mobile site for Wikipedia great enough and I use it
for editing instead of the native app.
rexford |
google.com/+Nkansahrexford | sent from smartphone
On Aug 16, 2014 9:28 AM, "svetlana" <svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, at 12:45, Nkansah Rexford wrote:
[...]
The Wikipedia app is currently under good development and I think its
doing
great.
We don't need apps. We need mobile websites which work as good as an app
does.
Oh, the waste of effort.
I truly pledge you to work together to make a website which is so good
that an 'app' is redundant.
svetlana
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l