On the collateral topic of where to publish project concepts... it's
complicated. I think this deserves its own discussion in the context
of the WMF product development process in the drafts. I have created a
topic at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Su5sgwsd967s1nya.
Hi Quim. How are IdeaLab ideas related to the WMF product development
process?
There
are other ongoing discussions related to the first steps of proposals
and experiments willing to be prioritized, and so far all of them are
referenced at the related task
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T115659.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
As a long-time phabricator user (and long-time
community member) I
really don't get the desire to push this to Phabricator. This is not
to say it is bad: it is good at what it is designed to do (handling
technical tasks in an all-encompassing sorta way). But lately it feels
like every conversation about a process involves debating whether that
too goes to Phabricator - in this case, a non-technical process.
Funded IdeaLab projects /that are technical/ ending up on Phabricator
sounds great: treat it as we would any other code. But the
consultations and discussions themselves are very deliberately
oriented towards our community - because IdeaLab projects are - a
community that tends not to have Phabricator accounts, not to have
experience using the system, and tends to conduct discussion in a much
more prose-based and conversational style than Phabricator easily
supports: it's designed for bug-tracking, not 100-comment threads.
MediaWiki, however, is designed (for a given value of "designed" ;p)
for those sorts of discussions, and additionally is software that
literally everyone people reach out to about the IdeaLab is likely to
be somewhat familiar with.
So I'd rather we kept the discussions there - in a venue that is
already used, for an audience that is familiar with that venue - than
shift them over to a project that isn't designed for these kinds of
interactions and doesn't offer familiarity to the users the IdeaLab
tries to reach. Phabricator should be for transparency and process
when a project with technical components is funded.
On 8 December 2015 at 01:14, Rob Lanphier <robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I wonder if we can use Phabricator as an incubator for IdeaLab
proposals?
> We already have the #possible-tech-projects
tag in Phabricator [1],
which
> seems like a sensible place to discuss the
ideas amongst the people who
> have ideas in this area.
>
> I know there is some cynicism about the upcoming Wikimedia Developer
Summit
> in January, because it seems like a great
opportunity to talk about
what we
> want, but then not have a strategy for
getting it done. That seems
> justified, since "resourcing" seems a constant refrain in these
> conversations. Would anyone from IdeaLab be available to be at WikiDev
> '16, looking out for appropriate opportunities to get from ideas to
> IdeaLab(tm) grant proposals?
>
> Rob
>
> [1] The board: <
>
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/possible-tech-projects/> and the
> description: <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/1042/>
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Chris Schilling <
cschilling(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I've recently initiated a consultation to help decide on topics for
IdeaLab
>> campaigns for the future, and I'm
very interested in your input on what
>> technical issues, gaps, or general features we could consider focusing
our
>> attention upon. These campaigns can
generate novel proposals for
tools and
>> improvements to address needs in the
Wikimedia projects to which you
>> contribute:
>>
>> <
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Future_IdeaLab_Campaigns>
>>
>> You can offer feedback and add your own campaign topics through a
survey
>> conducted through AllOurIdeas <
>>
http://www.allourideas.org/idealab_campaigns>
>> in addition to participating on the IdeaLab talk page.
>>
>> I’m looking forward to seeing your feedback and exploring potential
>> directions we can take IdeaLab campaigns starting next year.
>>
>> Take care,
>>
>> Jethro
>>
>> --
>> Chris "Jethro" Schilling
>> I JethroBT (WMF) <
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:I_JethroBT_(WMF)>
Community Organizer, Wikimedia Foundation
<https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Count Logula
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Quim Gil
Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Jonathan T. Morgan
Senior Design Researcher
Wikimedia Foundation
User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>