On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Platonides Platonides@gmail.com wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
On my usual test article [[Paris]], the slowest section ("History") parses in ~5 sec (Firefox 3.6.13, MacBook Pro). Chrome 10 takes 2 seconds. I believe these will already be acceptable to average users; optimisation should improve that further.
Cheers, Magnus
What about long tables?
Worst-case-scenario I could find: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_nuclides_(sorted_by_half-life)#Nuclide...
4.7 sec in Chrome 10 on my iMac. 6.2 sec in Firefox 4 beta 9. 10.7 sec in Firefox 3.6.
Could be worse, I guess...