On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
On my usual test article [[Paris]], the slowest
section ("History")
parses in ~5 sec (Firefox 3.6.13, MacBook Pro). Chrome 10 takes 2
seconds. I believe these will already be acceptable to average users;
optimisation should improve that further.
Cheers,
Magnus
What about long tables?
Worst-case-scenario I could find:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_nuclides_(sorted_by_half-life)#Nuclid…
4.7 sec in Chrome 10 on my iMac.
6.2 sec in Firefox 4 beta 9.
10.7 sec in Firefox 3.6.
Could be worse, I guess...