Hoi, The number of speakers is very much beside the point. The point is that we have a way of using two and three character codes that represent languages. Any two or three character codes will be confused as a consequence.
When you are talking about branding, you mention that some consistency is of important. This same logic applies here. It would be more sane to call it WikiWap
Thanks, GerardM
On 6/1/07, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
10500 speakers. I doubt they will request a Wikipedia anytime soon.
On 6/1/07, GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, There is a language called Wapishana that has the code wap. Because of
our
use of ISO-codes to indicate languages the wap code is not available for this purpose. Thanks, GerardM
On 6/1/07, Nick Jenkins nickpj@gmail.com wrote:
There is no wap.wikipedia.org.
It's:
May be worth having a very quick placeholder page at http://wap.wikipedia.org/ that just says "Try one of these sites" +
the 3
links. (Kind of like what http://www.wikipedia.org/ has, except it
doesn't
have to look any good at all - in fact, anyone using a mobile device
would
probably much prefer it to be exceedingly minimal).
-- All the best, Nick.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
-- Peace & Love, Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
"An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open, free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l