-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Roan Kattouw wrote:
I'd like to suggest a system in which different
people are responsible
for reviewing commits to different parts of the code, and mark revisions
as OK when they've reviewed them. The tag history I suggested on the
TODO list would be useful there.
Currently you can sort of do this by going through a list of things
tagged with a particular tag. Some path-based recognition would be handy
comments are open to any registered user on the wiki; status
changes and tagging updates are limited to the 'coder' group, which is
viral -- any coder can make another user a coder.
Since only you and Tim are
coders right now, could you mark a few other
devs (like me) as coders so this virus actually starts spreading?
Adding a few... :D
- -- brion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----