-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Roan Kattouw wrote:
I'd like to suggest a system in which different people are responsible for reviewing commits to different parts of the code, and mark revisions as OK when they've reviewed them. The tag history I suggested on the TODO list would be useful there.
Currently you can sort of do this by going through a list of things tagged with a particular tag. Some path-based recognition would be handy here. :)
Currently comments are open to any registered user on the wiki; status changes and tagging updates are limited to the 'coder' group, which is viral -- any coder can make another user a coder.
Since only you and Tim are coders right now, could you mark a few other devs (like me) as coders so this virus actually starts spreading?
Adding a few... :D
- -- brion