你好, 近排點呀? [0]
At Wikimania there was an improvised lunch-meeting about community
metrics with Jesús González-Barahona (Bitergia), Sumana, RobLa and
myself. The main conclusion was that
http://korma.wmflabs.org needs to
show a very few key metrics that could drive decisions affecting our
strategy and resources.
Let's agree first on key factors to watch, in the scope of projects
deployed in Wikimedia servers:
* Are the teams more efficient processing contributions?
* Is the share of non-WMF contributions growing?
* Are WMF and non-WMF contributions treated equally?
* Are the attraction and retention of new contributors improving?
* Are we improving the sustainability of our community?
If those are the key factors, these could be the key metrics:
# Who is contributing merged code each quarter? More origins == Better.
## WMF / WMDE / other Wikimedia / companies / OSS projects / independents
## Location of contributors (based on provided data)
# Time to resolve Gerrit changes. Shorter == Better.
## Authored by WMF/WMDE employees vs independent. Should be the same.
## Merged vs rejected. Similar progress?
## Best projects vs bottlenecks.
# Queue of open Gerrit change requests in relation to total amount of
contributions. Shorter == Better.
## Same points as above.
# New contributors with 1 / 2-5 / 6+ changes submitted in the past 3
months. More == Better.
## % of merged / rejected.
## Who is growing / stable / vanishing?
# Age of contributors since they started in the project. Small and
regular decline == Better.
## Number of contributions from each age group in the past quarters.
## WMF / non-WMF ratio for each age group.
Please have your say. I will be updating
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Community_metrics#Key_metrics following
the discussion.
[0]
http://wikitravel.org/en/Cantonese_phrasebook#Phrase_list ;)
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil