On 10/12/06, Platonides <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not a cache expert, i can't give very
accurate answers, but i'd say the
devs will
gladly implement this system for you... as far as you give them the hardware
to double
our caching ability :-)
Heh, "small matter of hardware"? Actually now that I think about it,
since presumably these blocked users still make up a very small
proportion of total page views (say 1% or less), it could be feasible
to offer an uncached version? But I'm really talking well and truly
out of my arse here.
Steve