Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:22:01PM -0800, Jason Richey
wrote:
Likewise, I was expecting to see a "really
really good" reason here...
Because:
* it's not safe for user
I'm afraid I don't know what you mean with that...
* there's no chance it will run on every machine
people would want
to see wikipedia on.
Right. But a thing like wxWindows will run on most of them, and there's
no reason not to distribute a HTML/JavaScript version as well for those few.
Is this good enough ?
Not IMHO. "Real" programs can have many advantages over JavaScript
hacks, for example the "updater" Brion mentioned.
Magnus