On 8/5/07, Paul grinberg <gri6507(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. For the most part, this
would be sufficient, except
in cases where on step 2.3.1.5 you have a table and the next step should
continue counting at 2.3.1.6. With your suggestion, the syntax would have to be
#### Text of step 2.3.1.5
{|
| a table
|}
<ol start=2>
<ol start=3>
<ol start=1>
<ol start=6>
#### Text of step 2.3.1.6
Not if you can mix them more thoroughly than that:
#### Text of step 2.3.1.4
<li>Text of step 2.3.1.5
{|
| a table
|}
</li>
#### Text of step 2.3.1.6
or
#### Text of step 2.3.1.4
###<li>Text of step 2.3.1.5
{|
| a table
|}
</li>
#### Text of step 2.3.1.6
Of course the <li> would have to be either on the previous line, or at
the start of a new line, for that to work. And someone has to write
it, which is the tricky part. ;) I don't think there's a bug report
requesting this, so someone could feel free to open one.