On 8/5/07, Paul grinberg gri6507@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. For the most part, this would be sufficient, except in cases where on step 2.3.1.5 you have a table and the next step should continue counting at 2.3.1.6. With your suggestion, the syntax would have to be
#### Text of step 2.3.1.5 {| | a table |}
<ol start=2> <ol start=3> <ol start=1> <ol start=6> #### Text of step 2.3.1.6
Not if you can mix them more thoroughly than that:
#### Text of step 2.3.1.4 <li>Text of step 2.3.1.5 {| | a table |} </li> #### Text of step 2.3.1.6
or
#### Text of step 2.3.1.4 ###<li>Text of step 2.3.1.5 {| | a table |} </li> #### Text of step 2.3.1.6
Of course the <li> would have to be either on the previous line, or at the start of a new line, for that to work. And someone has to write it, which is the tricky part. ;) I don't think there's a bug report requesting this, so someone could feel free to open one.