On 3/5/13 1:03 PM, vitalif(a)yourcmc.ru wrote:
I would just
like to note that while it may be "silly" or "useless" to
insert licenses into minified JavaScript, it is nonetheless *legally
required* to do so, regardless of the technical aspect of it.
My 2 points - during my own research about free licenses, I've decided
that for JS, a good license is MPL 2.0:
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/
I license all of my MediaWiki extensions under an MIT license since I
want people to be able to reuse the JS code on-wiki, but some people
have claimed that even MIT isn't compatible with CC-BY-SA [1]. I've been
thinking about switching to CC-Zero instead. It's funny how most "free
software" is so burdened with inane incompatible restrictions that we
can't legally use it in many situations. What do people think about
using CC-Zero as a license? Now that's free software!
1.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Copyrights/Archive_15#CC_BY-SA…
Ryan Kaldari