On 3/5/13 1:03 PM, vitalif@yourcmc.ru wrote:
I would just like to note that while it may be "silly" or "useless" to insert licenses into minified JavaScript, it is nonetheless *legally required* to do so, regardless of the technical aspect of it.
My 2 points - during my own research about free licenses, I've decided that for JS, a good license is MPL 2.0: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/
I license all of my MediaWiki extensions under an MIT license since I want people to be able to reuse the JS code on-wiki, but some people have claimed that even MIT isn't compatible with CC-BY-SA [1]. I've been thinking about switching to CC-Zero instead. It's funny how most "free software" is so burdened with inane incompatible restrictions that we can't legally use it in many situations. What do people think about using CC-Zero as a license? Now that's free software!
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Copyrights/Archive_15#CC_BY-SA_...
Ryan Kaldari