Kaixo!
(I lost the thread, so I'm replying here)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:55:14PM +0200, Milos Rancic wrote:
> While I recognize that there are long established
traditions favouring
> the two script approach to Serbian, I think that the ekavian/iyekavian
> distinction is going too far. It makes the idea of a single Serbian
is that difference only with the letter "e"?
If yes, why can't it be decided that some people pronounce it
as "je" (like they do in Russian, they just write "е" and not
"йе")
and some other people pronounce it as "e", and keep a single way of writting?
or the other way around, always write the "j", but some people not
pronounce it.
having two different writting systems just for that (which means four
different writting systemns in total) seems unjustified;
--
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga
http://chanae.walon.org/pablo/ PGP Key available, key ID: 0xD9B85466
[you can write me in Walloon, Spanish, French, English, Catalan or Esperanto]
[min povas skribi en valona, esperanta, angla aux latinidaj lingvoj]