On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Rob Lanphier <robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
It might be worthwhile to ask the authors why they
chose CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
instead of a free license (like MIT, Apache, GPL or AGPL). If we
approach them respectfully, we might convince them to learn more about
our ideals, and change the license on their software.
Good idea. I sent a note to the authors to explain why the non-commercial
clause is incompatible with "open source" and to encourage them to release
the code and model under a permissive license. I will share any updates
with the list.