On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Rob Lanphier robla@wikimedia.org wrote:
It might be worthwhile to ask the authors why they chose CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 instead of a free license (like MIT, Apache, GPL or AGPL). If we approach them respectfully, we might convince them to learn more about our ideals, and change the license on their software.
Good idea. I sent a note to the authors to explain why the non-commercial clause is incompatible with "open source" and to encourage them to release the code and model under a permissive license. I will share any updates with the list.