Brion Vibber wrote:
That reads
fine and the experience is quite fast. Thanks for the work!
What I don't understand is why Ganglia only shows ~ 3.3 TB of disk_total
while there should be about 4.8 TB.
The RAID eats up some of the raw disks' space with the redundancy. Either that
or I've lost track of something. ;)
Hm, shouldn't 6 of 8 disks (8 - 1 for parity - 1 spare) per RAID be
available in a RAID 5? So each array should provide 2400 GB (2232 GiB,
don't know if Ganglia's GB really are GB or wrongly named GiB).
Can I read
something about that planned rearrange anywhere?
There's some notes scribbled at
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/1.6_image_storage
Thanks
Jürgen