First let me say Bravo. I can't even imagine the amount of work that
this took.
I do have a wonder about section 3
As a parent I understand the need for some exclusion of information but
I worry about what appears to be a blanket removal (hiding?) of
information. I agree with a methodology which will suppress information
based on age. But it appears from your note that the information is
suppressed period. Does this same " .. too graphic for an eight year
old girl to read .. " information get suppressed for a 13, 15 or 18 year
old?
Once again Bravo for this endeavor, I just hope that the methodology
will improve as time goes on. As much as I want to protect my children,
also would hate to have valid information kept from them.
Thank you so much for your hard work.
You wrote ..
3) We also took out other content unsuitable for children. For example
we judged
http://schools-wikipedia.org/wp/m/Mauthausen-Gusen_concentration_camp.ht
m
as historically important but the section on "Inmates" too graphic for
an eight year old girl to read. We also took out references/external
links sections since it looks like the community doesn't want to vouch
for these. Largely this is done using a simple "exclude section xyz" on
the entry data.
DSig
David Tod Sigafoos | SANMAR Corporation
PICK Guy
206-770-5585
davesigafoos(a)sanmar.com