First let me say Bravo. I can't even imagine the amount of work that this took.
I do have a wonder about section 3
As a parent I understand the need for some exclusion of information but I worry about what appears to be a blanket removal (hiding?) of information. I agree with a methodology which will suppress information based on age. But it appears from your note that the information is suppressed period. Does this same " .. too graphic for an eight year old girl to read .. " information get suppressed for a 13, 15 or 18 year old?
Once again Bravo for this endeavor, I just hope that the methodology will improve as time goes on. As much as I want to protect my children, also would hate to have valid information kept from them.
Thank you so much for your hard work.
You wrote .. 3) We also took out other content unsuitable for children. For example we judged http://schools-wikipedia.org/wp/m/Mauthausen-Gusen_concentration_camp.ht m as historically important but the section on "Inmates" too graphic for an eight year old girl to read. We also took out references/external links sections since it looks like the community doesn't want to vouch for these. Largely this is done using a simple "exclude section xyz" on the entry data.
DSig David Tod Sigafoos | SANMAR Corporation PICK Guy 206-770-5585 davesigafoos@sanmar.com