Ray Kiddy wrote:
Is the intention that you are using ISO-639? or
ISO-629/2? Or both? Or
ISO-639 and ISO-629/2 and whatever we feel like adding?
RFC 3066, like the rest of the net, with a few rare exceptions such as als.
As I am looking at the langs table in the
"experimental schema", I am
curious if there is a reason you did not go ahead and put a column in
for the locale, as defined in ISO 3166. The point is almost too obvious
to make. Does American English equal British English? There may be no
need for this right now. However, one can easily imagine that people
might want to localize articles, as well as translate them. At that
point, the locale would become significant.
No idea what schema you're talking about.
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)