On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 20:07, Erik Moeller wrote:
Laurent-
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 19:19, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Attacking anyone who disagrees with you is not.
Unless I've missed some part of the
discussion you're
the one who "attacked" on the issue by shutting down
one wikipedia language.
Not at all. Tim Starling disabled the wiki on my request because it was
not created in consensus. However, should the wiki be reinstated without
due process, I will if necessary take it down myself.
Now, you can do it the right way, by establishing consensus or at least a
proven majority in support, or you can continue complaining about the fact
that this attempt to subvert due process failed. What do you prefer?
You have very peculiar views on democracy and discussion, you just
deleted all my arguments on this point without answering them and it
looks like you do the same for all responses that don't fit your views,
I hope you won't harm too much the wikipedia project respectability.
Anyway, you can count my vote for not changing the currently documented
rule of 5-10 active contributors to create a new wikipedia language.
Laurent
PS: I would even support immediate creation of all languages listed
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_639 with a template page (in a few
major languages) calling for help in filling them.