MZMcBride wrote:
Given that the Renameuser extension now uses the job
queue for renames
involving over 10,000 edits (and thus no longer locking the site for large
renames), is there any technical reason not to give administrators the
renameuser right?
Renaming a user who doesn't expect it would be very disruptive. This
isn't something we'd really want to give out to every sysop.
I'd much rather see a sensible system for self-renames (with decent
throttling, checks, etc)
-- brion