Is my vote included here ?
You didn't express any opposition, just ask to create help page (that we all agree). You didn't vote, so how your vote may be included!? That doesn't mean we didn't hear your arguments, but if you don't express clearly any opposition, how can we guess?
LOL. No, I was just wondering if I were the neutral ;-) I was not going to oppose it anymore, you all seem so convinced it is necessary that it probably is.
From the moment I suggested the documentation, that meant I did not vote against, no?
I truely would not know what to vote :-(
I hope you will not follow the opinion of some to just ban and
automatically revert those using non utf browsers as some users were suggesting :-)
Anyone is free to express his own suggestion; that don't make them rules. I'm personally fully against this idea.
Good.
Was the page of explanation for these unfortunate users set as suggested before the switch ?
We are working on:
* http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%E9dia:Unicode * http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%E9dia:Unicode/Test * http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%E9dia:Test_Unicode_arabe * http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%E9dia:Navigateur If you want more, help us ;o)
Neat. I will add the macintosh 9 recommandations then.
Anyhow, it will be easier to surround all problems after the switch. How to speak about problem we don't have yet?
Errrr. Usually I think it is best to talk about problems before meeting them...
I don't understand why you wait the discussion is done to express you? You just want to express your disgust about a too pretty consensus? ;o)
No, I expressed myself about that. Our discussion is still on Le Bistro. I think there was nothing more to add :-) And precisely because the consensus was so pretty, I decided not to say anything any more. I am just worried about that reversion issue. Even if most said they would help the newcomers, a couple of people said they would just revert and prevent the person to edit.
It goes without saying that I would consider that very wrong. I think that if someone unilaterally decide to ban a person because of his browser, without helping him to upgrade it, there should be a rule added about it, and banning for such a reason not allowed. We shall see.
For all technical considerations, I am useless, so I leave that to you :-)
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster.