Tomer Chachamu (the.r3m0t(a)gmail.com) [050329 06:30]:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:30:25 +0800, b schewek
<schewek(a)linuxmail.org> wrote:
> Have there been any considerations to add
support
> for the following ideas:
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Reviewed_article_version
People have not yet agreed on
[[meta:Article_validation]] - even some
basic issues, such as whether to show to anons the reviewed or latest
version. I can't imagine support for this will be in 1.5.
That's a really bad thing, considering a pile of plans are hung waiting for
just that feature or something like it.
The current suggestion is to try running ratings and see if they end up
with sensible results. So rather than using the results, we just ... gather
the data then the data is sanity-checked. This would mean making sure the
feature was *stable* (production-ready) rather than *ideally
feature-complete*, because what's done with any ratings would almost
certainly change.
Would a test version of the feature (that gathers data but does not do
things with it) be more of a prospect for 1.5?
- d.