On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Consider the following edit sequence:
A, B, C, D, E
A is a previously approved version. B, and D are all excellent edits.
C and E are obvious vandalism. E even managed to undo all the good
changes of B,D while adding the vandalism.
The only way to handle this sort of thing is to actually look at the
intermediate edits. I don't know if there is a nice way to simplify
that workflow, but it points me towards the idea that reviewing should
be done off the history page, not directly off a list of "unreviewed
pages".
- Carl