Magnus Manske wrote:
OK, I made "Category" and "Category
talk" real namespaces. Hey, we're up
to 15 now (not including "special")! Does anyone remember the time when
we used to write an encyclopedia?...
15? ... Hm ...
0: Articles; 1: Talk; 2-3: User [talk]; 4-5: Wikipedia [talk]; 6-7:
Image [talk]; 8-9: MediaWiki [talk]; 10-11: Template [talk].
That's all I know so far ... with Category and Category talk that makes
only 14, or "up to" 13 in numbers (I think that's what you meant). In
URLs we also have "Special:" but you said you didn't count that one. In
links we have "Media:" but that uses the "Image" namespace. So what
is/are the remaining one/two namespace(s)?
However, this reminded me of something. It would be useful to be able to
use the Category scheme to categorise Wikipedia-namespace pages too
(e.g. "Help" pages, "Policy" pages, etc.) However, those
categorisations
should be separate from article categorisations. Therefore would we want
a "Wikipedia category" and "Wikipedia category talk" namespace too?
:)
Things like "List of Wikipedians from $country" could also be replaced
by a "User category" namespace. The same argumentation could apply to
the "Template" namespace :)
Timwi