Hoi, Just a question, the WMF has invested a lot of effort in producing fonts for many of the languages it supports. These fonts are better than the fonts used in packages like Ubuntu.
Is there a problem in using the WMF supported font ? It certainly makes the inconsistency in Ubuntu moot. Thanks, GerardM
On 28 January 2014 00:16, Marco Fleckinger marco.fleckinger@wikipedia.atwrote:
"C. Scott Ananian" cananian@wikimedia.org wrote:
I don't happen to know the Fedora packages, but I'd be glad to add them to the README when you get a set which works.
may you also add it to the article:
https://mediawiki.org/wiki/PDF_rendering/Installation/en
Unfortunately, the hard parts are identifying all the font packages, as package names for non-latin fonts seem to be wildly inconsistent even between different Ubuntu releases. :(
Hm interesting. Concerning Tex everything went quite for me on Debian, although Matthew shared Ubuntu's packet names. Is this relevant to the article as well?
Marco
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l