Rob Lanphier wrote:
We tried reversing it several times, and each time were
rewarded with an
arduous cleanup task. We gave up trying after months. So, calling it
"kneejerk" is simply wrong. We had a determined vandal who may still be
among us, and will likely exploit whatever loophole we open up.
Okay, I apologize for using that term.
We can certainly do something different than what
we're doing, though. It
should be easy to get editbugs; just not so easy that a vandal can get it.
Okay, let's. I proposed reverting the settings change. You don't like that
idea. Your turn. :-)