Rob Lanphier wrote:
We tried reversing it several times, and each time were rewarded with an arduous cleanup task. We gave up trying after months. So, calling it "kneejerk" is simply wrong. We had a determined vandal who may still be among us, and will likely exploit whatever loophole we open up.
Okay, I apologize for using that term.
We can certainly do something different than what we're doing, though. It should be easy to get editbugs; just not so easy that a vandal can get it.
Okay, let's. I proposed reverting the settings change. You don't like that idea. Your turn. :-)
MZMcBride